Home Up General Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 The 3rd Head Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28 Question 29 Question 30 Question 31 Question 32 Question 33 Question 34 Question 35
|
Question XX
Of the Firth Method of Pronouncing Sentence
Since, therefore, the accused is
either found innocent and is to be altogether absolved, or is found only to be
generally defamed as a heretic, or is found a proper subject for the questions
and the torture on account of her reputation, or is found to be lightly
suspected of heresy, or is found to be strongly or gravely suspected of heresy,
or is found to be at the same time commonly defamed and suspected of heresy, or
is found to have confessed her heresy and to be penitent but probably to have
relapsed, or is found to have confessed her heresy and to be impenitent but not
really to have relapsed, or is found to have confessed but by legitimate
witnesses and otherwise legally to have been convicted of heresy, or is found to
have been convicted of heresy but to have escaped or defiantly absented herself,
or is found not to have done injury by witchcraft but to have removed
bewitchments unfittingly and by unlawful means, or is found to be an
archer-wizard or enchanter of weapons with the purpose of causing death, or is
found to be a witch-midwife offerings infants to the devil in the manner of an
enemy, or is found to make frivolous and fraudulent appeals with a view to
saving her life:
Therefore, if she is found to be
entirely innocent, the final sentence shall be pronounced in the following
manner:
Here it is to be noted that the
accused is found to be entirely innocent when, after the facts of the process
have been diligently discussed in consultation with skilled lawyers, she cannot
be convicted either by her own confession, or by the evidence of the fact, or by
the production of legitimate witnesses (since they have disagreed upon the main
issue); and when the accused has never before been suspected of or publicly
defamed as regards that crime (but the case is different if she has been defamed
as regards some other crime); and when there is no evidence of the fact against
her. In such a case the following procedure is observed; for she is to be
absolved by the Bishop or Judge by a sentence to the following effect:
We N., by the mercy of God Bishop of
such a town (or Judge, etc.), considering that you N. of such a place and such a
Diocese have been accused before us of the crime of heresy and namely of
witchcraft; and considering that this accusation was such as we could not pass
over with connivent eyes, have condescended to inquire whether the aforesaid
accusation can be substantiated as true, by calling witnesses, by examining you,
and by using other means which are fitting according to the canonical sanctions.
Wherefore having diligently seen and examined all that has been done and said in
this case, and having had the counsel of learned lawyers and Theologians, and
having repeatedly examined and inquired into all; sitting as Judges on this
tribunal and having only God before our eyes and the truth of the case, and the
Holy Gospels being placed before us that our judgement may proceed from the
countenance of God and our eyes behold equity, we proceed to our definitive
sentence in this way, invoking the name of Christ. Since by that which we have
seen and heard, and has been produced, offered, done, and executed before us in
this present case, we have not found that anything has legally been proved
against you of those things of which you were accused before us, we pronounce,
declare, and give it as our final sentence that no act has legally been proved
to us against you by which you can or ought to be judged a heretic or witch of
heresy. Wherefore by this present declaration, inquiry, and judgement, we freely
discharge you. This sentence was given, etc.
Let care be taken not to put anywhere
in the sentence that the accused is innocent or immune, but that it was not
legally proved against him; for if after a little time he should again be
brought to trial, and it should be legally proved, he can, notwithstanding the
previous sentence of absolution, then be condemned.
Note also that the same method of
absolution may be used in the case of one who is accused of receiving,
protecting, or otherwise comforting and favouring heretics, when nothing is
legally proved against him.
A secular Judge commissioned by the
Bishop shall use his own manner of pronouncement.
|