Home Up General Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 The 3rd Head Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27 Question 28 Question 29 Question 30 Question 31 Question 32 Question 33 Question 34 Question 35
|
Question IV
Of the Quality and Condition of Witnesses
Note that persons under a sentence
of excommunication, associates and accomplices in the crime, notorious evildoers
and criminals, or servants giving evidence against their masters, are admitted
as witnesses in a case concerning the Faith. And just as a heretic may give
evidence against a heretic, so may a witch against a witch; but this only in
default of other proofs, and such evidence can only be admitted for the
prosecution and not for the defence: this is true also of the evidence of the
prisoner's wife, sons and kindred; for the evidence of such has more weight in
proving a charge than in disproving it.
This is made clear in the c. in
fidei de haer., where it says: As a protection of the faith we allow that in
a case of inquiry into the sin of heresy, persons under excommunication and
partners and accomplices in the crime shall be admitted as witnesses, in default
of other proofs against heretics and their patrons, protectors and defenders;
provided that it appears probably both from the number of the witnesses and of
those against whom they give evidence, and from other cicumstances, that they
are not giving false testimony.
The case of evidence given by
perjurers, when it is presumed that they are speaking out of zeal for the faith,
is deal with in the Canon c. accusatus, § licet, where it says
that the evidence of perjurers, after they have repented, is admissable; and it
goes on to say: If it manifestly appears that they do not speak in a spirit of
levity, or from motives of enmity, or by reason of a bribe, but purely out of
zeal for the orthodox faith, wishing to correct what they have said, or to
reveal something about which they had kept silence, in defence of the faith,
their testimony shell be as valid as that of anyone else, provided that there is
no other obection to it.
And it is clear from the same chapter
of the Canon that the testimony of men or low repute and criminals, and of
servants against their masters, is admitted; for it says: So great is the plague
of heresy that, in an action involving this crime, even servants are admitted as
witnesses against their masters, and any criminal evildoer may give evidence
against any person soever.
|